Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators
Open Access
- 12 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 110 (supplement), 14102-14109
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212745110
Abstract
The present article presents an up-to-date account of the current media relations of scientists, based on a comprehensive analysis of relevant surveys. The evidence suggests that most scientists consider visibility in the media important and responding to journalists a professional duty—an attitude that is reinforced by universities and other science organizations. Scientific communities continue to regulate media contacts with their members by certain norms that compete with the motivating and regulating influences of public information departments. Most scientists assume a two-arena model with a gap between the arenas of internal scientific and public communication. They want to meet the public in the public arena, not in the arena of internal scientific communication. Despite obvious changes in science and in the media system, the orientations of scientists toward the media, as well as the patterns of interaction with journalists, have their roots in the early 1980s. Although there is more influence on public communication from the science organizations and more emphasis on strategic considerations today, the available data do not indicate abrupt changes in communication practices or in the relevant beliefs and attitudes of scientists in the past 30 y. Changes in the science–media interface may be expected from the ongoing structural transformation of the public communication system. However, as yet, there is little evidence of an erosion of the dominant orientation toward the public and public communication within the younger generation of scientists.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Media orientation of German university decision makers and the executive influence of public relationsPublic Relations Review, 2013
- Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science newsJournalism, 2011
- Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy AdviceScience, Technology, & Human Values, 2010
- Engaging the public in biodiversity issuesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Scientists who engage with society perform better academicallyScience and Public Policy, 2008
- Popular Science Publishing and Contributions to Public Discourse among University FacultyScience Communication, 2005
- Ingelfinger, Embargoes, and Other Controls on the Dissemination of Science NewsScience Communication, 1997
- The Biologist as a Source of Information for the PressBulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 1995
- A Question of Accuracy: How Journalists and Scientists Report Research on HazardsJournal of Communication, 1990
- Science and the press: Like oil and water?American Psychologist, 1988