A critique of earthworm molecular phylogenetics
- 29 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Pedobiologia
- Vol. 54, S3-S9
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.07.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- DNA Barcoding Reveals Cryptic Diversity in Lumbricus terrestris L., 1758 (Clitellata): Resurrection of L. herculeus (Savigny, 1826)PLOS ONE, 2010
- Re‐integrating earthworm juveniles into soil biodiversity studies: species identification through DNA barcodingMolecular Ecology Resources, 2010
- Neotypification of Drawida hattamimizu Hatai, 1930 (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Megadrili, Moniligastridae) as a model linking mtDNA (COI) sequences to an earthworm type, with a response to the ‘Can of Worms’ theory of cryptic speciesZooKeys, 2010
- Opening a can of worms: unprecedented sympatric cryptic diversity within British lumbricid earthwormsMolecular Ecology, 2008
- MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequencesBriefings in Bioinformatics, 2008
- Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and EchiuraBMC Evolutionary Biology, 2007
- A review of molecular markers used for Annelid phylogeneticsIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 2006
- 18S rDNA phylogeny of Clitellata (Annelida)Zoologica Scripta, 2004
- Validating Livanow: Molecular Data Agree That Leeches, Branchiobdellidans, and Acanthobdella peledina Form a Monophyletic Group of OligochaetesMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2001
- Rapidly Evolving Lineages Impede the Resolution of Phylogenetic Relationships among Clitellata (Annelida)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2000