Intraocular lens power calculations after refractive surgery: Consensus-K technique
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 33 (11), 1892-1898
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.045
Abstract
To describe a new strategy for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), determine the accuracy of the method, and compare the results with those of previously described techniques. Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. This retrospective comparative series compared eyes having cataract extraction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and eyes having cataract extraction without previous surgery (control group) from January 1997 to December 2005. In the LASIK group, 2 strategies were used to determine the appropriate corneal curvature (K) value for IOL calculation: (1) the nonconsensus method and (2) the consensus-K technique. Postoperative outcomes were compared and included refraction, deviation from target refraction, and deviation from the ideal K or ideal IOL value for several techniques. There were 43 LASIK eyes (14 nonconsensus and 29 consensus K) and 50 control eyes. The mean absolute deviation from target refraction in the nonconsensus group (1.47 diopters [D]) was significantly higher than that in the consensus-K group (0.52 D) (P = .02) or control group (0.44 D) (P = .01); the mean was not statistically different between the consensus-K group and the control group (P = .5). Compared with values with the consensus-K technique, the absolute deviation from back-calculated K values was significantly higher (P<.05) with all other K-generating methods tested except the classic refractive history method (0.56 D versus 0.65 D) (P = .4). When compared with the IOL value generated using the consensus-K technique, the absolute deviation from back-calculated IOL values was significantly higher for all other methods (P<.05). The consensus-K technique generated refractive outcomes similar to those in the control group and was better than with all other K- or IOL-generating techniques except the classic refractive history method. The consensus method showed less variability and higher predictability than all other methods tested.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical and Theoretical Results of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation for Cataract Surgery After Photorefractive Keratectomy for MyopiaAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia and HyperopiaCornea, 2001
- Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2001
- Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after photorefractive keratectomyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomyOphthalmology, 1999
- Intraocular Lens Power Prediction in Patients Who Undergo Cataract Surgery Following Previous Radial KeratotomyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997
- Calculation of Intraocular Lens Power After Radial Keratotomy With Computerized VideokeratographyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995
- Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation after excimer photorefractive keratectomy: A case reportJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1994
- Refractive Complications of Cataract Surgery After Radial KeratotomyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1989