Parotid gland-recovery after radiotherapy in the head and neck region - 36 months follow-up of a prospective clinical study
Open Access
- 27 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 6 (1), 125
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-6-125
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the recovery potential of the parotid glands after using either 3D-conformal-radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by sparing one single parotid gland. Between 06/2002 and 10/2008, 117 patients with head and neck cancer were included in this prospective, non-randomised clinical study. All patients were treated with curative intent. Salivary gland function was assessed by measuring stimulated salivary flow at the beginning, during and at the end of radiotherapy as well as 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment. Measurements were converted to flow rates and normalized relative to rates before treatment. Mean doses (Dmean) were calculated from dose-volume histograms based on computed tomographies of the parotid glands. Patients were grouped according to the Dmean of the spared parotid gland having the lowest radiation exposure: Group I - Dmean < 26 Gy (n = 36), group II - Dmean 26-40 Gy (n = 45), and group III - Dmean > 40 Gy (n = 36). 15/117 (13%) patients received IMRT. By using IMRT as compared to 3D-CRT the Dmean of the spared parotid gland could be significantly reduced (Dmean IMRT vs. 3D-CRT: 21.7 vs. 34.4 Gy, p < 0.001). The relative salivary flow rates (RFSR) as a function of the mean parotid dose after 24 and 36 months was in group I 66% and 74%, in group II 56% and 49%, and in group III 31% and 24%, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the parotid gland dose and the tumor site were the independent determinants 12 and 36 months after the end of RT. Patients of group I and II parotid gland function did recover at 12, 24, and 36 months after the end of RT. If a Dmean < 26 Gy for at least one parotid gland can be achieved then this is sufficient to reach complete recovery of pre-RT salivary flow rates. The radiation volume which depends on tumor site did significantly impact on the Dmean of the parotids, and thus on the saliva flow and recovery of parotid gland.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Salivary Gland Dosimetry on Post-IMRT Recovery of Saliva Output and Xerostomia Grade for Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Treated With or Without Contralateral Submandibular Gland Sparing: A Longitudinal StudyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2011
- Evaluation of salivary gland function after treatment of head-and-neck tumors with intensity-modulated radiotherapy by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- Quality of life after parotid-sparing IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: A prospective longitudinal studyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003
- Sparing of Contralateral Major Salivary Glands Has a Significant Effect on Oral Health in Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy of Head and Neck TumorsStrahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2002
- Preservation of parotid function with uncomplicated conformal radiotherapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2002
- Parotid and submandibular/sublingual salivary flow during high dose radiotherapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2001
- Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitroJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2001
- A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial resultsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2001
- Conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer: the potential for improved target irradiation, salivary gland function, and quality of life.1999
- Effect of Radiation-Induced Xerostomia on Human Oral MicrofloraJournal of Dental Research, 1975