Differences in electrical stimulation thresholds between men and women
- 25 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Neurology
- Vol. 63 (4), 507-512
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21346
Abstract
Objective Surface electrical stimulation (ES) of skeletal muscle is used in a variety of clinical settings in healthy and unhealthy subjects of both sexes. Although women generally present larger amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue than men, which could limit current flow to the stimulated muscle, sex‐related differences in ES current levels have not been clearly demonstrated to date. We report data from healthy men and wom Methods Sensory (current perception), motor (minimal knee extension torque production), and supramotor thresholds (10% of the maximal voluntary knee extension torque) and perceived pain during surface ES of the quadriceps femoris muscle were investigated in 40 healthy volunteers (20 men, 20 women). Results Sensory threshold was lower in women than in men (−43%; p < 0.001). Similarly, female muscles required lower current amplitudes to attain the supramotor threshold (−17%; p < 0.01). The Visual Analogue Scale pain score was significantly greater in women than in men at motor threshold (+112%; p < 0.01) but not at supramotor threshold (+36%; p > 0.05). Interpretation Collectively, our data demonstrate higher sensory and supramotor excitability to surface ES in female subjects and provide further evidence for a neurophysiological explanation for more pronounced pain perception in women. These observations may help clinicians to better understand the sex‐specific response to ES and to design more rational stimulation treatments with the ultimate goal of optimizing patient care and safety. Ann Neurol 2008This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Central Contributions to Contractions Evoked by Tetanic Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2007
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitationMuscle & Nerve, 2007
- Comparison of low-frequency electrical myostimulation and conventional aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failureEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2005
- Gender differences in electrical pain threshold responses to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Neuroscience Letters, 2005
- Selective activation of AMPK‐PGC‐1α or PKB‐TSC2‐mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training‐like electrical muscle stimulationThe FASEB Journal, 2005
- Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Strengthen the Quadriceps Femoris?Sports Medicine, 2005
- The Physiology of Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationPediatric Physical Therapy, 1997
- Electromyostimulation from a Clinical PerspectiveSports Medicine, 1988
- Studies with pain rating scales.Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1978
- Physiological properties of unmyelinated fiber projection to the spinal cordExperimental Neurology, 1966