What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 October 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Global Health
- Vol. 2 (4), e000486
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000486
Abstract
Responsiveness is a key objective of national health systems. Responsive health systems anticipate and adapt to existing and future health needs, thus contributing to better health outcomes. Of all the health systems objectives, responsiveness is the least studied, which perhaps reflects lack of comprehensive frameworks that go beyond the normative characteristics of responsive services. This paper contributes to a growing, yet limited, knowledge on this topic. Herewith, we review the current frameworks for understanding health systems responsiveness and drawing on these, as well as key frameworks from the wider public services literature, propose a comprehensive conceptual framework for health systems responsiveness. This paper should be of interest to different stakeholders who are engaged in analysing and improving health systems responsiveness. Our review shows that existing knowledge on health systems responsiveness can be extended along the three areas. First, responsiveness entails an actual experience of people’s interaction with their health system, which confirms or disconfirms their initial expectations of the system. Second, the experience of interaction is shaped by both the people and the health systems sides of this interaction. Third, different influences shape people’s interaction with their health system, ultimately affecting their resultant experiences. Therefore, recognition of both people and health systems sides of interaction and their key determinants would enhance the conceptualisations of responsiveness. Our proposed framework builds on, and advances, the core frameworks in the health systems literature. It positions the experience of interaction between people and health system as the centrepiece and recognises the determinants of responsiveness experience both from the health systems (eg, actors, processes) and the people (eg, initial expectations) sides. While we hope to trigger further thinking on the conceptualisation of health system responsiveness, the proposed framework can guide assessments of, and interventions to strengthen, health systems responsiveness.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the barriers to setting up a healthcare quality improvement process in resource-limited settings: a situational analysis at the Medical Department of Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, MalawiBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Resources, attitudes and culture: an understanding of the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms in primary health care settingsBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Evaluation of Responsiveness of Community Health Services in Urban China: A Quantitative Study in Wuhan CityPLOS ONE, 2013
- Testing the WHO responsiveness concept in the Iranian mental healthcare system: a qualitative study of service usersBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Holding health providers in developing countries accountable to consumers: a synthesis of relevant scholarshipHealth Policy and Planning, 2011
- A critical assessment of the WHO responsiveness tool: lessons from voluntary HIV testing and counselling services in KenyaBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South AfricaBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: Gateway to good governanceHealth Policy, 2009
- A model to prioritize access to elective surgery on the basis of clinical urgency and waiting timeBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsivenessconceptBMC Health Services Research, 2007