Cytohistologic Discrepancies
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 117 (4), 567-573
- https://doi.org/10.1309/j6jm-2741-hm34-1f1e
Abstract
The use of cytohistologic discrepancies to investigate and reduce error seldom is studied. All gynecologic discrepancies (n = 283; 0.87% and 7.37% of all cytologic and histologic cases, respectively) and nongynecologic discrepancies (n = 146; 2.26% and 0.44% of all cytologic and histologic cases, respectively) for 26 months were classified as sampling or interpretive. Specimen type and pathologist discrepancy percentages, effect of discrepancies on patient outcome, and interobserver agreement of discrepancies were evaluated. Discrepancies were interpretive in 67% and 34% of gynecologic and nongynecologic cases, respectively. Statistically significant associations were seen between individual pathologist and discrepancy percentages. Breast (1.2%) and bronchial (0.8%) cytologic diagnoses had the highest discrepancy percentages. The kappa scores ranged from 0.02 to 0.45 for pairwise agreement of discrepant cases. Of nongynecologic interpretive discrepancies available for review, 63% (27/43) and 14% (6/43) were of no or minor clinical significance, respectively. Cytohistologic correlation is a useful tool to monitor performance and to identify specimen types prone to error.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic InterpretationsRealistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage StudyJAMA, 2001
- What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal PolypsLaboratory Investigation, 2000
- Physician education and report cards: do they make the grade? Results from a randomized controlled trialAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1999
- Personal performance profiles: a useful adjunct to quality assurance in cervical cyt_logyCytopathology, 1998
- Aberrant Diagnoses by Individual Surgical PathologistsThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1998
- Quality Assessment and Tracking Results of Cardiac SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Performance measurement in prostate cancer care: Beyond report cardsUrology, 1996
- Report Cards on Cardiac Surgeons — Assessing New York State's ApproachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Cytologic/Histologic Correlation for Quality Control in Cervicovaginal Cytology:Experience With 1,582 Paired CasesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled, non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsiesDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1993