Comparison of homoleptic and heteroleptic 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ruthenium complexes as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence reagents in aqueous solution
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Analytica Chimica Acta
- Vol. 635 (1), 94-101
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.12.042
Abstract
We have conducted a comprehensive comparative study of Ru(bipy)32+, Ru(bipy)2(phen)2+, Ru(bipy)(phen)22+, and Ru(phen)32+ as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence (ECL) reagents, to address several previous conflicting observations and gain a greater insight into their potential for chemical analysis. Clear trends were observed in many of their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties, but the relative chemiluminescence or ECL intensity with a range of analytes/co-reactants is complicated by the contribution of numerous (sometimes opposing) factors. Significantly, the reversibility of cyclic voltammetric responses for the complexes decreased as the number of phenanthroline ligands was increased, due to the lower stability of their ruthenium(III) form in the aqueous solvent. This trend was also evident over a longer timescale when the ruthenium(III) form was spectrophotometrically monitored after chemical oxidation of the ruthenium(II) complexes. In general, the greater stability of Ru(bipy)33+ resulted in lower blank signals, although this effect was less pronounced with ECL, where the reagent is oxidised in the presence of the co-reactants. Nevertheless, this shows the need to compare signal-to-blank ratios or detection limits, rather than the more common comparisons of overall signal intensity for different ruthenium complexes. Furthermore, our results support previous observations that, compared to Ru(bipy)32+, Ru(phen)32+ provides greater ECL and chemiluminescence intensities with oxalate, which in some circumstances translates to superior detection limits, but they do not support the subsequent generalised notion that Ru(phen)32+ is a more sensitive reagent than Ru(bipy)32+ for all analytes.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) chemiluminescenceThe Analyst, 2006
- Investigation of RuBPS–Ce(IV) chemiluminescence reaction and its application in determination of two diureticsAnalytica Chimica Acta, 2005
- Electrochemiluminescence (ECL)Chemical Reviews, 2004
- Synthesis and characterization of electrochemiluminescent ruthenium(II) complexes containing o-phenanthroline and various α-diimine ligandsTalanta, 2004
- Electrochemically generated chemiluminescence of tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(ii), tris(1,10-phenathroline)ruthenium(ii) and tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)ruthenium(ii) complexesJ. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002
- Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence. 65. An Investigation of the Oxidation of Oxalate by Tris(polypyridine) Ruthenium Complexes and the Effect of the Electrochemical Steps on the Emission IntensityThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999
- Analytical applications of tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(III) as a chemiluminescent reagentAnalytica Chimica Acta, 1998
- Photochemistry of MLCT excited states. Effect of nonchromophoric ligand variations on photophysical properties in the series cis-Ru(bpy)2L22+Inorganic Chemistry, 1983
- Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. XIII. Electrochemical and electrogenerated chemiluminescence studies of ruthenium chelatesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1973
- CHEMILUMINESCENCE FROM THE REDUCTION OF AROMATIC AMINE CATIONS AND RUTHENIUM(III) CHELATES*,‡Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1971