The use of a neodymium-iron-boron magnet device for positioning a multi-stranded wire retainer in lingual retention--a pilot study in humans
Open Access
- 7 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 30 (5), 433-436
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn037
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the time requirement of a newly developed device made of neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnets for positioning a multi-stranded, canine-to-canine retainer during bonding compared with dental floss and a transfer tray. Forty-five patients aged between 12 and 33 years (26 male, 19 female) previously treated with fixed appliances were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups (15 per group). For each group a mandibular canine-to-canine retainer of 0.018 inch Dentaflex multi-stranded wire (Dentaurum) was prefabricated for each patient on a cast. The bonding procedure was identical, except for the method of positioning the wire during adhesive fixation: group A dental floss, group B a small prefabricated transfer tray of dental resin and group C the NdFeB magnet device. For each group, the time required for the complete bonding process was measured. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were used for group and pairwise comparisons, respectively. The three methods required statistically significant different times (P < 0.001). The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test revealed that wire positioning with the magnet device was significantly faster [4.98 minutes; standard deviation (SD) 0.68 minutes] than with dental floss (7.65 minutes, SD 1.14 minutes; P = 0.0001) or with transfer tray (5.75 minutes, SD 0.57 minutes; P = 0.001). The NdFeB magnet device is a timesaving appliance for positioning a multi-stranded, canine-to-canine retainer during bonding when compared with dental floss and an individually prefabricated transfer tray.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnet decoration, beautiful but potentially dangerous for patients with implantable pacemakers or defibrillatorsHeart Rhythm, 2007
- A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainersEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1997
- Permanent magnets and hard magnetic materialsJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1996
- Bonded orthodontic retainers: A reviewAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995
- The use of magnets in orthodontic therapy: panel discussionEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1993
- An attractive solution to unerupted teethAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1991
- An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretentionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- A precise and time-saving method of setting up an indirectly bonded retainerAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapseAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982
- Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment—first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodonticsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1981