Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses
- 25 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Vol. 242 (4), 900-907
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.017
Abstract
Defenses protect prey, while offenses arm predators. Some defenses and offenses are constitutive (e.g. tortoise shells), while others are phenotypically plastic and not always expressed (e.g. neckteeth in water fleas). All of them are costly and only adaptive at certain prey densities. Here, I analyse such density-dependent effects, applying a functional response model to categorize defenses and offenses and qualitatively predict at which prey densities each category should evolve (if it is constitutive) or be expressed (if it is phenotypically plastic). The categories refer to the step of the predation cycle that a defense or offense affects: (1) search, (2) encounter, (3) detection, (4) attack, or (5) meal. For example, prey warning signals such as red coloration prevent predator attacks and are hence step 4 defenses, while sharp predator eyes enhance detection and are step 3 offenses. My theoretical analyses predict that step 1 defenses, which prevent predators from searching for their next meal (e.g. toxic substances), evolve or are expressed at intermediate prey densities. Other defenses, however, should be most beneficial at low prey densities. Regarding predators, step 1 offenses (e.g. immunity against prey toxins) are predicted to evolve or be expressed at high prey densities, other offenses at intermediate densities. I provide evidence from the literature that supports these predictions.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2000
- Shifts in Foraging Tactics of Larval Damselflies: Effects of Prey DensityOikos, 1999
- Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A HypothesisJournal of Ecology, 1995
- Daphnia-Phytoplankton Interactions in Lakes: Is There a Need for Ratio-Dependent Consumer-Resource Models?The American Naturalist, 1993
- Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-DependenceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: Behavioral observations1Limnology and Oceanography, 1984
- Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insectNature, 1981
- EFFECT OF DINOFLAGELLATE BIOLUMINESCENCE ON COPEPOD INGESTION RATES1Limnology and Oceanography, 1972
- Geometry for the selfish herdJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1971
- Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and ParasitismThe Canadian Entomologist, 1959