Rankings
Publications
Sources
Publishers
Scholars
Organizations
About
Login
Register
Home
Publications
Comparisons of Prediction Formulas for Maize Hybrids
1
Home
Publications
Comparisons of Prediction Formulas for Maize Hybrids
1
Comparisons of Prediction Formulas for Maize Hybrids
1
YO
Y. Otsuka
Y. Otsuka
SE
S. A. Eberhart
S. A. Eberhart
WR
W. A. Russell
W. A. Russell
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Cite
Download
Share
Download
1 May 1972
journal article
Published by
Wiley
in
Crop Science
Vol. 12
(3)
,
325-331
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183x001200030020x
Abstract
Three-way and double-cross maize (
Zea mays
L.) hybrid means were predicted with various formulas involving linear functions of general and specific effects estimated from single-cross diallels. When the efficiencies of these predictors were compared with the correlations of observed and predicted means as the criteria of comparison, the “optimumw eight” predictor was most efficient for hybrids from unselected lines derived from the variety ‘BSK.’ The “optimum weight” predictor did not give the highest correlation for hybrids from a highly selected set of 10 lines, indicating a substantial bias due to epistasis. Even with hybrids from the selected set of lines, the genotype by environmental interaction was a greater potential source of bias than was epistasis unless the trials were grown in a large number of environments. The prediction formula with nonparental single-cross means (Jenkins' method B) was nearly as efficient as the “optimum weight” predictor. We xecommendth at the appropriate single crosses be grown in a preliminary trial at several locations and that the three-way and double-cross performance be predicted from the nonparental singlecross means. A reduced number of selected hybrids
per se
should then be evaluated over enough environments to enable the breeder to select the superior hybrids for commercial release. Copyright © . .
Keywords
DOUBLE CROSS
SUP
EPISTASIS
BIAS
GROWN
MAIZE
COMPARISON
FUNCTIONS
All Articles
Open Access
Cited by 14 articles