Infant Emotional and Cortisol Responses to Goal Blockage
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Child Development
- Vol. 76 (2), 518-530
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00860.x
Abstract
This study examined the relation of infant emotional responses of anger and sadness to cortisol response in 2 goal blockage situations. One goal blockage with 4‐month‐old infants (N=56) involved a contingency learning procedure where infants' learned response was no longer effective in reinstating an event. The other goal blockage with 6‐month‐old infants (N=84) involved the still face procedure where infants' reactions to their mothers' lack of responsivity were not effective in reestablishing interaction. For both blockages, sadness was related to cortisol response, though anger was not—the greater the sadness, the higher the cortisol response. This differential relation is consistent with other evidence indicating the more positive role of anger as opposed to sadness in overcoming an obstacle.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Additional Components of the Still-Face Effect: Commentary on Adamson and FrickInfancy, 2003
- Four‐Month Attentional Regulation and Its Prediction of Three‐Year ComplianceInfancy, 2002
- Facial Expressivity at 4 Months: A Context by Expression AnalysisInfancy, 2002
- Arousal modulation in cocaine-exposed infants.Developmental Psychology, 1998
- Dampening of Adrenocortical Responses during Infancy: Normative Changes and Individual DifferencesChild Development, 1996
- Helplessness in Early Childhood: The Role of Contingent WorthChild Development, 1995
- Smiling and Fussing in Seven-Month-Old Preterm and Full-Term Black Infants in the Still-Face SituationChild Development, 1995
- Individual differences in anger and sad expressions during extinction: antecedents and consequencesInfant Behavior and Development, 1992
- Violation of expectancy, loss of control, and anger expressions in young infants.Developmental Psychology, 1990
- Emotions and emotional communication in infants.American Psychologist, 1989