Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Perspectives
- Vol. 18 (2), 39-53
- https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13837437
Abstract
Many of the recent corruption scandals at formerly venerated organizations such as Enron, WorldCom, and Parmalat have some noteworthy features in common. In most instances, the fraudulent acts involved knowing cooperation among numerous employees who were upstanding community members. givers to charity, and caring parents-far removed from the prototypical image of a criminal. The involvement of such individuals in corrupt acts, and the persistence of the acts over time, is both disturbing and puzzling. We argue that the above phenomenon can be explained in part by the rationalization tactics used by individuals committing unethical or fraudulent acts. Rationalizations are mental strategies that allow employees (and others around them) to view their corrupt acts as justified. Employees may collectively use rationalizations to neutralize any regrets or negative feelings that emanate from their participation in unethical acts. Further, rationalizations are often accompanied by socialization tactics through which newcomers entering corrupt units are induced to accept and practice the ongoing unethical acts and their associated rationalizations. We describe the different forms of rationalization and socialization tactics and the ways in which firms can prevent or reverse their occurrence among employees. The onset of these two tactics can establish enduring corruption in organizations and become institutionalized in seemingly innocuous processes.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- applying social learning theory to police misconductDeviant Behavior, 2004
- THE NORMALIZATION OF CORRUPTION IN ORGANIZATIONSResearch in Organizational Behavior, 2003
- The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justiceJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2002
- Comparison-level preferences after performance: Is downward comparison theory still useful?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- “How Can You Do It?”: Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive IdentityAcademy of Management Review, 1999
- A behavioral agency model of managerial risk takingAcademy of Management Review, 1997
- Managerial Categorization of Competitors: Using Old Maps to Navigate New EnvironmentsOrganization Science, 1996
- MORAL EXCLUSION AND INJUSTICE - AN INTRODUCTIONJournal of Social Issues, 1990
- Criminological theory and organizational crimeJustice Quarterly, 1989
- INCREASING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE DAY RELIEF TEXTILE MACHINE OPERATORJournal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1980