From Research to Practice: The Importance of Appropriate Outcome Selection, Measurement, and Reporting in Pediatric Mental Health Research
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Vol. 59 (4), 497-500
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.08.468
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review: What Outcomes Count? Outcomes Measured for Adolescent Depression Between 2007 and 2017Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019
- Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic ReviewPEDIATRICS, 2017
- Integrated collaborative care teams to enhance service delivery to youth with mental health and substance use challenges: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trialBMJ Open, 2017
- What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice.American Psychologist, 2017
- Minimal Clinically Important DifferenceJAMA, 2014
- Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
- The use and abuse of multiple outcomes in randomized controlled depression trialsContemporary Clinical Trials, 2011
- A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in ChildrenPLoS Medicine, 2008
- The standard error in the Jacobson and Truax Reliable Change Index: The classical approach to the assessment of reliable changeJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2004