Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 262 (2), 237-242
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001200
Abstract
We hypothesized that immediate laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal abscess would result in faster recovery than conservative treatment.On the basis of the retrospective studies, conservative management of appendiceal abscess is recommended as a first line treatment, but some controversy exists.Sixty adult patients diagnosed with appendiceal abscess were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic surgery (n = 30) or conservative treatment (n = 30). Hospital stay, recurrences, additional interventions, and complications within 60 days from randomization were recorded.There was no difference in hospital stay: 4 days (interquartile range: 3-5 days) in the laparoscopy group versus 5 days (3-8) in the conservative group, P = 0.105. Patients in the laparoscopy group had 10% risk for bowel resection and 13% risk for incomplete appendectomy. There were significantly fewer patients with unplanned readmissions in the laparoscopy group: 1 (3%) versus 8 (27%), P = 0.026. Additional interventions were required in 2 (7%) patients in the laparoscopy group (percutaneous drainage) and in 9 (30%) patients in the conservative group (surgery), P = 0.042. Recurrent abscesses and failure to respond to conservative treatment were the main reasons for additional interventions. Open surgery was required in 3 (10%) patients in the laparoscopy group and in 4 (13%) patients in the conservative group. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients in laparoscopic group versus 2 patients in the conservative group. The rate of uneventful recovery was 90% in the laparoscopy group versus 50% in the conservative group, P = 0.002.Laparoscopic surgery in experienced hands is safe and feasible first-line treatment for appendiceal abscess. It is associated with fewer readmissions and fewer additional interventions than conservative treatment with comparable hospital stay.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2013
- Improving Outcomes After Laparoscopic AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2011
- A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon)Surgery, 2010
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysisWorld Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trialJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2010
- Nonsurgical Treatment of Appendiceal Abscess or PhlegmonAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated AppendicitisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Current Concepts in Imaging of AppendicitisRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2007
- Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal massJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2002
- Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscessDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001