Why do Controllers Choose the Conflict Resolution Maneuvers that They Do?
- 19 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology
- Vol. 32 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2021.1925119
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to reveal the causal reasons for maneuver preferences on the basis of the objective measures. Background: Although the effects of conflict geometry have been well documented in previous literature, empirical evidence on the influence of conflict geometry on the operator’s workload, maneuver choice, and success is still lacking. Method: Thirteen undergraduate students with air traffic control (ATC) knowledge were requested to complete ATC tasks and resolve six different conflicts that were generated by manipulating two geometric features, namely, lateral (i.e., crossing, converging, and overtaking) and vertical (i.e., level and nonlevel) conflicts. Results: Crossing (p < .01) and converging (p = .05) conflicts resulted in higher workload than overtaking conflicts because of the higher geometric dimensions involved. Workload (p < .01) and performance (p < .03) were worse during nonlevel conflicts than during level conflicts. Notably, vertical maneuver led to a higher workload than other maneuver choices despite the higher preference for this maneuver. These findings were associated with visualization load. Conclusion: We failed to confirm that the resolution maneuver was chosen because of its good performance and low workload. Instead, predetermined rules (i.e., altitude, speed, and heading) were used, regardless of the workload, and the safety of the chosen maneuver for a particular conflict geometry was verified.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conflict Resolution Maneuvers in Air Traffic Control: Investigation of Operational DataThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2012
- Pilot Performance in Trajectory-Based Operations Under Concepts of Operation That Vary Separation Responsibility Across Pilots, Air Traffic Controllers, and AutomationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2012
- Assessing the Situation Awareness of Pilots Engaged in Self SpacingProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2008
- Display Dimensionality and Conflict Geometry Effects on Maneuver Preferences for Resolving In-Flight ConflictsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008
- Comparison of Pilots' and Controllers' Conflict Resolution Maneuver PreferencesProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2006
- Hierarchical Conflict Detection in Air Traffic ControlThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2005
- Time-Based Modeling of Human PerformanceProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2005
- A model of air traffic controllers' conflict detection and conflict resolutionAerospace Science and Technology, 2003
- Pilot Maneuver Choice and Workload in Free FlightHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002
- Variation of Operator's Strategies and Regulating Effects on WorkloadErgonomics, 1971