Neuroprognostication Practices in Postcardiac Arrest Patients: An International Survey of Critical Care Providers
- 1 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 48 (2), e107-e114
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004107
Abstract
To characterize approaches to neurologic outcome prediction by practitioners who assess prognosis in unconscious cardiac arrest individuals, and assess compliance to available guidelines. International cross-sectional study. We administered a web-based survey to members of Neurocritical Care Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and American Academy of Neurology who manage unconscious cardiac arrest patients to characterize practitioner demographics and current neuroprognostic practice patterns. Physicians that are members of aforementioned societies who care for successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest individuals. Not applicable. A total of 762 physicians from 22 countries responses were obtained. A significant proportion of respondents used absent corneal reflexes (33.5%) and absent pupillary reflexes (36.2%) at 24 hours, which is earlier than the recommended 72 hours in the standard guidelines. Certain components of the neurologic examination may be overvalued, such as absent motor response or extensor posturing, which 87% of respondents considered being very or critically important prognostic indicators. Respondents continue to rely on myoclonic status epilepticus and neuroimaging, which were favored over median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for prognostication, although the latter has been demonstrated to have a higher predictive value. Regarding definitive recommendations based on poor neurologic prognosis, most physicians seem to wait until the postarrest timepoints proposed by current guidelines, but up to 25% use premature time windows. Neuroprognostic approaches to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy vary among physicians and are often not consistent with current guidelines. The overall inconsistency in approaches and deviation from evidence-based recommendations are concerning in this disease state where mortality is so integrally related to outcome prediction.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rate of brain death and organ donation in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysisIntensive Care Medicine, 2016
- Part 8: Post–Cardiac Arrest CareCirculation, 2015
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2015 guidelines for post-resuscitation careIntensive Care Medicine, 2015
- Awakening and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Cardiac Arrest Survivors Treated With Therapeutic Hypothermia*Critical Care Medicine, 2014
- Level of consciousness on admission to a Heart Attack Centre is a predictor of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrestResuscitation, 2014
- Quality of evidence in studies evaluating neuroimaging for neurologic prognostication in adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrestResuscitation, 2014
- The influence of induced hypothermia and delayed prognostication on the mode of death after cardiac arrestResuscitation, 2013
- Strong and weak aspects of an established post-resuscitation treatment protocol—A five-year observational studyResuscitation, 2011
- Practice Parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review)Neurology, 2006
- Mode of death after admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrestIntensive Care Medicine, 2004