Assessing the accuracy of an inter-institutional automated patient-specific health problem list
Open Access
- 23 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 10 (1), 10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-10
Abstract
Health problem lists are a key component of electronic health records and are instrumental in the development of decision-support systems that encourage best practices and optimal patient safety. Most health problem lists require initial clinical information to be entered manually and few integrate information across care providers and institutions. This study assesses the accuracy of a novel approach to create an inter-institutional automated health problem list in a computerized medical record (MOXXI) that integrates three sources of information for an individual patient: diagnostic codes from medical services claims from all treating physicians, therapeutic indications from electronic prescriptions, and single-indication drugs. Data for this study were obtained from 121 general practitioners and all medical services provided for 22,248 of their patients. At the opening of a patient's file, all health problems detected through medical service utilization or single-indication drug use were flagged to the physician in the MOXXI system. Each new arising health problem were presented as 'potential' and physicians were prompted to specify if the health problem was valid (Y) or not (N) or if they preferred to reassess its validity at a later time. A total of 263,527 health problems, representing 891 unique problems, were identified for the group of 22,248 patients. Medical services claims contributed to the majority of problems identified (77%), followed by therapeutic indications from electronic prescriptions (14%), and single-indication drugs (9%). Physicians actively chose to assess 41.7% (n = 106,950) of health problems. Overall, 73% of the problems assessed were considered valid; 42% originated from medical service diagnostic codes, 11% from single indication drugs, and 47% from prescription indications. Twelve percent of problems identified through other treating physicians were considered valid compared to 28% identified through study physician claims. Automation of an inter-institutional problem list added over half of all validated problems to the health problem list of which 12% were generated by conditions treated by other physicians. Automating the integration of existing information sources provides timely access to accurate and relevant health problem information. It may also accelerate the uptake and use of electronic medical record systems.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated medical problem list generation: towards a patient timeline.2004
- Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication ErrorsJAMA, 1998
- Improving clinician acceptance and use of computerized documentation of coded diagnosis.1997
- Computer-generated prescription forms for discharge medicationsAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1996
- Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in the ED: Analysis of a high-risk populationThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- The Accuracy of Medication Data in an Outpatient Electronic Medical RecordJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reportsBMJ, 1995
- Medication-management component of a point-of-care information systemAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1995
- A simple approach to physician entry of patient problem list.1994
- Non-categorical problem lists in a primary-care information system.1991