Public–private partnerships in the US and Canada: “There are no free lunches”1
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
- Vol. 7 (3), 199-220
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980500209363
Abstract
Governments in many industrialized nations have made concerted efforts to reduce their immediate expenditures and to reduce the cost of major infrastructure projects. Public–private partnerships (P3s) are one emerging method that might do so. Despite the increased use of P3s, there is little independent research on the effectiveness of P3s as a public policy instrument. This article considers the major rationales for P3s, including cost savings and keeping project financing off government budgets. It then presents a transaction cost model that suggests that P3s can often be prone to conflict, high contracting costs, opportunism and failure. Evidence from six major infrastructure projects and a summary analysis of US prisons is then presented. These cases confirm that contracting costs have been high, as predicted by the model. Specifically, high contracting costs reflect the presence of complexity/uncertainty, asset specificity, the potential for ex post bilateral opportunism and a lack of contract management skills by governments. Given these circumstances, the private sector can behave opportunistically at the expense of the public sector as there has sometimes been a political imperative to prevent projects from terminating. Public partners have also behaved opportunistically after projects are in place. Unless public sector managers recognize that they must design contracts that both compensate private sector partners for risk and then ensure that they actually bear it, P3s have little chance of being efficient or effective service delivery mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Problems with contracting out government services: lessons from orderly services at SCGHIndustrial and Corporate Change, 2004
- The Capital Asset Pricing ModelJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2004
- The Assessment: Financing and Managing Public ServicesOxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003
- Private FinanceOxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003
- Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme?Public Administration Review, 2002
- Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S. Prison SystemAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1999
- A Comparative Recidivism Analysis of Releasees from Private and Public PrisonsCrime & Delinquency, 1999
- USE, ESTEEM, AND PROFIT IN VOLUNTARY PROVISION: TOLL ROADS IN CALIFORNIA, 1850—1902Economic Inquiry, 1996
- Public‐ and Private‐Sector Occupational Pay StructuresIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1991
- The Science of AstronomyScience, 1903