Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL‐OLD module
- 16 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
- Vol. 22 (2), 292-305
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00523.x
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD six-facet, 24-item module designed for assessing generic quality of life cross-culturally among the elderly. Using quota-stratified sampling defined on the basis of sex, age and geographical representation, 401 respondents were drawn from Statistics Norway and completed postal surveys. An additional 89 elderly completed personal interviews. Correlation and multivariate analyses partly confirmed the relevance of individual items and facets in both groups. All items correlated significantly higher with their original facets, although almost half of these items correlated with other facets in both groups. Multiple regression analysis of the module and two overall questions (dependent variables) showed that three facets made significant contributions to overall health, with Social Participation (B = 0.09) contributing most strongly in the postal-group. In the interview-group, only Social Participation (B = 0.20) was found to make a significant contribution, and this was in relation to overall health satisfaction. When the WHOQOL-BREF total score was considered as the dependent variable, different facets contributed significantly in both groups. Exploratory factor analysis of the WHOQOL-OLD in the combined group of both postal and interview samples, resulted in a five-factor solution (eigenvalues >1) explaining 65% of the cumulative variance in five of the six originally operationalized facets. The most conceptually clear facets were Death and Dying and Sensory Abilities. Further, confirmatory factor analyses in the combined group demonstrated a model with good fit, but with high covariance between the factors. Acceptable internal consistency was shown except for the Past, Present and Future Activities in both groups. Since construct validity was only partially confirmed, exploration of the scale's conceptual validity needs further testing in Norwegian and international samples.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international procotol designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adultsQuality of Life Research, 2006
- Development of the WHOQOL-Old ModuleQuality of Life Research, 2005
- Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instrumentsQuality of Life Research, 2005
- The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL GroupQuality of Life Research, 2004
- Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settingsSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2004
- Let's Ask Them: A National Survey of Definitions of Quality of Life and Its Enhancement among People Aged 65 and OverInternational Journal of Aging & Human Development, 2003
- Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life AssessmentPsychological Medicine, 1998
- LEIPAD, an Internationally Applicable Instrument to Assess Quality of Life in the ElderlyBehavioral Medicine, 1998
- Elderly people's definitions of quality of lifeSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL)Quality of Life Research, 1993