Average Is Optimal: An Inverted-U Relationship between Trial-to-Trial Brain Activity and Behavioral Performance
Open Access
- 7 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Computational Biology
- Vol. 9 (11), e1003348
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003348
Abstract
It is well known that even under identical task conditions, there is a tremendous amount of trial-to-trial variability in both brain activity and behavioral output. Thus far the vast majority of event-related potential (ERP) studies investigating the relationship between trial-to-trial fluctuations in brain activity and behavioral performance have only tested a monotonic relationship between them. However, it was recently found that across-trial variability can correlate with behavioral performance independent of trial-averaged activity. This finding predicts a U- or inverted-U- shaped relationship between trial-to-trial brain activity and behavioral output, depending on whether larger brain variability is associated with better or worse behavior, respectively. Using a visual stimulus detection task, we provide evidence from human electrocorticography (ECoG) for an inverted-U brain-behavior relationship: When the raw fluctuation in broadband ECoG activity is closer to the across-trial mean, hit rate is higher and reaction times faster. Importantly, we show that this relationship is present not only in the post-stimulus task-evoked brain activity, but also in the pre-stimulus spontaneous brain activity, suggesting anticipatory brain dynamics. Our findings are consistent with the presence of stochastic noise in the brain. They further support attractor network theories, which postulate that the brain settles into a more confined state space under task performance, and proximity to the targeted trajectory is associated with better performance. The human brain is notoriously “noisy”. Even with identical physical sensory inputs and task demands, brain responses and behavioral output vary tremendously from trial to trial. Such brain and behavioral variability and the relationship between them have been the focus of intense neuroscience research for decades. Traditionally, it is thought that the relationship between trial-to-trial brain activity and behavioral performance is monotonic: the highest or lowest brain activity levels are associated with the best behavioral performance. Using invasive recordings in neurosurgical patients, we demonstrate an inverted-U relationship between brain and behavioral variability. Under such a relationship, moderate brain activity is associated with the best performance, while both very low and very high brain activity levels are predictive of compromised performance. These results have significant implications for our understanding of brain functioning. They further support recent theoretical frameworks that view the brain as an active nonlinear dynamical system instead of a passive signal-processing device.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spontaneous High-Gamma Band Activity Reflects Functional Organization of Auditory Cortex in the Awake MacaqueNeuron, 2012
- Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Individual Differences in Uncertainty-Driven ExplorationNeuron, 2012
- Cholinergic modulation of cognition: Insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimagingProgress in Neurobiology, 2011
- A dynamical systems view of motor preparationPublished by Elsevier BV ,2011
- Inverted-U–Shaped Dopamine Actions on Human Working Memory and Cognitive ControlBiological Psychiatry, 2011
- Attractor concretion as a mechanism for the formation of context representationsNeuroImage, 2010
- The Temporal Structures and Functional Significance of Scale-free Brain ActivityNeuron, 2010
- Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representationsTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010
- The Emergence of Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Simple Cells of Cat Visual CortexNeuron, 2007
- Transient Dynamics versus Fixed Points in Odor Representations by Locust Antennal Lobe Projection NeuronsNeuron, 2005