The Mystification of Organizational Learning
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management Inquiry
- Vol. 14 (1), 19-30
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492604273758
Abstract
Despite the growing popularity of organizational learning and the proliferation of literature on the subject, the concept remains elusive for researchers and managers alike. This article argues that enduring uncertainty about the meaning and practice of organizational learning reflects its so-called mystification. It attributes mystification to five features of the field: (a) ever-increasing conceptual diversity, (b) anthropomorphizing organizational learning, (c) a split in the field between visionaries and skeptics, (d) the reification of terminology, and (e) active mystification of the concept. The article explains and illustrates how the literature on organizational learning has contributed to these processes of mystification. It concludes by specifying a number of strategies that researchers and practitioners can employ to demystify the concept of organizational learning.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Typology of the Idea of Learning OrganizationManagement Learning, 2002
- A Note on the Concept of Tacit KnowledgeJournal of Management Inquiry, 2002
- Moral Foundations of the Learning OrganizationHuman Relations, 2001
- Chic, Mystique, and MisconceptionThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2000
- Spirituality for Business LeadershipJournal of Management Inquiry, 2000
- Introduction to Spirituality for Business LeadershipJournal of Management Inquiry, 2000
- The Learning Organization: Changed Means to an Unchanged EndOrganization, 2000
- Learning as Problem-Driven or Learning in the Face of Mystery?Organization Studies, 1999
- Incident Reviews in High-Hazard Industries: Sense Making and Learning Under Ambiguity and AccountabilityIndustrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 1995
- Organizational LearningAcademy of Management Review, 1985