Daily physical activity assessment: what is the importance of upper limb movements vs whole body movements?
- 22 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 28 (9), 1105-1110
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802712
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The movement of the upper limbs (eg fidgeting-like activities) is a meaningful component of nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT). This study examined the relationship between upper limb movements and whole body trunk movements, by simultaneously measuring energy expenditure during the course of the day. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study consisting of 88 subjects with a wide range in body mass index (17.3–32.5 kg/m2). The energy expenditure over a 24-h period was measured in a large respiratory chamber. The body movements were assessed by two uniaxial-accelerometers during daytime, one on the waist and the other on the dominant arm. The accelerometry scores from level 0 (=immobile) up to level 9 (=maximal intensity) were recorded. The activities of subjects were classified into eight categories: walking at two speeds on a horizontal treadmill (A & B), ambling (C), self-care tasks (D), desk work (E), meals (F), reading (G), watching TV (H). RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between the accelerometry scores from the waist (ACwaist) and that from the wrist (ACwrist) over the daytime period (R2=0.64; P<0.001). The ACwrist was systematically higher than the ACwaist during sedentary activities, whereas it was the reverse for walking activities. ACwrist to ACwaist ratio of activities E–H were above 1.0 and for walking activities (A–C) were below 1.0. A multiple regression analysis for predicting daytime energy expenditure revealed that the explained variance improved by 2% only when the ACwrist was added as a second predictor in addition to the ACwaist. This indicates that the effect of the ACwrist for predicting energy expenditure was of limited importance in our conditions of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The acceleration of the upper limbs which includes fidgeting is more elevated than that of the whole body for sitting/lying down activities. However, their contribution to energy expenditure is lower than whole body trunk movements, thus indicating that the weight-bearing locomotion activities may be a key component of NEAT. However, its contribution may depend on the total duration of the upper limb movements during the course of the day.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetryBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2004
- Walking Activity Measured by Accelerometry During Respiratory RehabilitationJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 2003
- Measurement of Human Daily Physical ActivityObesity Research, 2003
- Ambulatory measurement of upper limb usage and mobility-related activities during normal daily life with an upper limb-activity monitor: a feasibility study.Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2002
- A new accelerometric method to assess the daily walking practiceInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- Validation of three alternative methods to measure total energy expenditure against the doubly labeled water method for older Japanese men.Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 2002
- Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity MonitorBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 2001
- Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter.Stroke, 2000
- Role of Nonexercise Activity Thermogenesis in Resistance to Fat Gain in HumansScience, 1999
- Long-term measurements of energy expenditure in humans using a respiration chamberThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1983