Similar Sensitivity of Time to Exhaustion and Time-Trial Time to Changes in Endurance
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 40 (3), 574-578
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815e728f
Abstract
There is widespread misunderstanding about the ability of constant-power tests to quantify changes in endurance performance. We have therefore compared the sensitivity of a constant-power test with that of a time trial for the effects of arterial oxygenation on endurance performance.Eight cyclists performed three constant-power rides to exhaustion and three 5-km time trials on a cycle ergometer in conditions of normoxia, hypoxia, and hyperoxia. After logarithmic transformation of performance times, sensitivity was calculated as the mean change in time divided by the error of measurement derived from the standard deviation of change scores.In normoxia, performance times were 488 +/- 77 s for the constant-power test and 454 +/- 16 s (mean +/- SD) for the time trial. The mean and standard deviation of the change in performance time from normoxia to hypoxia were much larger in the constant-power test (-45% +/- 13%) than in the time trial (5.7% +/- 1.6%); there was a similar disparity in the change from normoxia to hyperoxia (123% +/- 37% and -4.1% +/- 1.4%, respectively). However, sensitivity for the normoxia-hypoxia change in performance in the constant-power test (6.3, 90% confidence interval 4.3-11.4) was similar to that in the time trial (4.5, 3.0-8.2); sensitivities were also similar for the normoxia-hyperoxia changes (3.2, 2.1-6.0; 3.8, 2.5-6.9, respectively). P values for mean performance changes (range, 0.0002-0.000002) reflected these sensitivities.Time to exhaustion has sensitivity similar to that of time-trial time for the effects of arterial oxygenation and presumably other factors affecting endurance performance. Sensitivity need not be a concern when using constant-power tests to quantify changes in endurance performance.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- SHOULD TIME TRIAL PERFORMANCE BE PREDICTED FROM THREE SERIAL TIME-TO-EXHAUSTION TESTS?Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- Effects of Prior Warm-up Regime on Severe-Intensity Cycling PerformanceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- Reliability of Time to Exhaustion Analyzed with Critical-Power and Log-Log ModelingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- Inspiratory resistive loading improves cycling capacity: a placebo controlled trialBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Influence of Testing Protocol on Ventilatory Thresholds and Cycling PerformanceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004
- Reliability of Power in Physical Performance TestsSports Medicine, 2001
- Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and ScienceSports Medicine, 2000
- Effects of ambient temperature on the capacity to perform prolonged cycle exercise in manMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1997
- A new validated endurance performance testMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1996
- Synthesizing standardized mean‐change measuresBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1988