Understanding an evolving pandemic: An analysis of the clinical time delay distributions of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom
Open Access
- 20 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (10), e0257978
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257978
Abstract
Understanding and monitoring the epidemiological time delay dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection provides insights that are key to discerning changes in the phenotype of the virus, the demographics impacted, the efficacy of treatment, and the ability of the health service to manage large volumes of patients. This paper analyses how the pandemic has evolved in the United Kingdom through the temporal changes to the epidemiological time delay distributions for clinical outcomes. Using the most complete clinical data presently available, we have analysed, through a doubly interval censored Bayesian modelling approach, the time from infection to a clinical outcome. Across the pandemic, for the periods that were defined as epidemiologically distinct, the modelled mean ranges from 8.0 to 9.7 days for infection to hospitalisation, 10.3 to 15.0 days for hospitalisation to death, and 17.4 to 24.7 days for infection to death. The time delay from infection to hospitalisation has increased since the first wave of the pandemic. A marked decrease was observed in the time from hospitalisation to death and infection to death at times of high incidence when hospitals and ICUs were under the most pressure. There is a clear relationship between age groups that is indicative of the youngest and oldest demographics having the shortest time delay distributions before a clinical outcome. A statistically significant difference was found between genders for the time delay from infection to hospitalisation, which was not found for hospitalisation to death. The results by age group indicate that younger demographics that require clinical intervention for SARS-CoV-2 infection are more likely to require earlier hospitalisation that leads to a shorter time to death, which is suggestive of the largely more vulnerable nature of these individuals that succumb to infection. The distinction found between genders for exposure to hospitalisation is revealing of gender healthcare seeking behaviours.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Men and COVID-19: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Mortality and Recommendations for Practice and Policy InterventionsPreventing Chronic Disease, 2020
- Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemicsThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Covid-19: Lack of testing led to patients being discharged to care homes with virus, say auditorsPublished by BMJ ,2020
- Ventilation of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unitsHerz, 2020
- Incubation Period and Other Epidemiological Characteristics of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections with Right Truncation: A Statistical Analysis of Publicly Available Case DataJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
- Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICStatistics and Computing, 2016
- Estimating incubation period distributions with coarse dataStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Incubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Men and health help‐seeking behaviour: literature reviewJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2005
- Ignorability and Coarse DataThe Annals of Statistics, 1991