Availability and Readability of Emergency Preparedness Materials for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing and Older Adult Populations: Issues and Assessments
Open Access
- 25 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (2), e55614
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055614
Abstract
A major public health challenge is to communicate effectively with vulnerable populations about preparing for disasters and other health emergencies. People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (Deaf/HH) and older adults are particularly vulnerable during health emergencies and require communications that are accessible and understandable. Although health literacy studies indicate that the readability of health communication materials often exceeds people’s literacy levels, we could find no research about the readability of emergency preparedness materials (EPM) intended for Deaf/HH and older adult populations. The objective of this study was to explore issues related to EPM for Deaf/HH and older adult populations, to assess the availability and readability of materials for these populations, and to recommend improvements. In two California counties, we interviewed staff at 14 community-based organizations (CBOs) serving Deaf/HH clients and 20 CBOs serving older adults selected from a stratified, random sample of 227 CBOs. We collected 40 EPM from 10 CBOs and 2 public health departments and 40 EPM from 14 local and national websites with EPM for the public. We used computerized assessments to test the U.S. grade reading levels of the 16 eligible CBO and health department EPM, and the 18 eligible website materials. Results showed that less than half of CBOs had EPM for their clients. All EPM intended for clients of Deaf/HH-serving CBOs tested above the recommended 4th grade reading level, and 91% of the materials intended for clients of older adult-serving CBOs scored above the recommended 6th grade level. EPM for these populations should be widely available through CBOs and public health departments, adhere to health literacy principles, and be accessible in alternative formats including American Sign Language. Developers should engage the intended users of EPM as co-designers and testers. This study adds to the limited literature about EPM for these populations.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hearing Loss Prevalence in the United StatesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Participatory Design of Mass Health Communication in Three Languages for Seniors and People With Disabilities on MedicaidAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Low Health LiteracyProfessional Case Management, 2007
- Katrina-Related Health Concerns of Latino Survivors and EvacueesJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2007
- Discriminating signs: Perceptual precursors to acquiring a visual-gestural languageInfant Behavior and Development, 2007
- An Assessment of the Cultural Appropriateness of Emergency Preparedness Communication for Low Income MinoritiesJournal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2007
- Understanding health literacy: an expanded modelHealth Promotion International, 2005
- Hearing Mothers and Their Deaf Children: The Relationship between Early, Ongoing Mode Match and Subsequent Mental Health Functioning in AdolescenceJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2004
- Health Literacy: Report of the Council on Scientific AffairsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1999
- Teaching Patients with Low Literacy SkillsThe American Journal of Nursing, 1996