Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 6 (12), 571-583
- https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571
Abstract
Colonoscopy is the diagnostic modality of choice for investigation of symptoms suspected to be related to the colon and for the detection of polyps and colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy with removal of detected polyps has been shown to reduce the incidence and mortality of subsequent CRC. In many countries, population screening programs for CRC have been initiated, either by selection of patients for colonoscopy with fecal occult blood testing or by offering colonoscopy directly to average-risk individuals. Several endoscopy societies have formulated quality indicators for colonoscopy. These quality indicators are almost always incorporated as process indicators, rather than outcome measures. This review focuses on the quality indicators bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate, patient comfort, sedation and complication rate, and discusses the scientific evidence supporting them, as well as their potential shortcomings and issues that need to be addressed. For instance, there is still no clear and generally accepted definition of adequate bowel preparation, no robust scientific evidence is available supporting a cecal intubation rate ≥ 90% and the association between withdrawal time and occurrence of interval cancers has not been clarified. Adenoma detection rate is currently the only quality indicator that has been shown to be associated with interval colorectal cancer, but as an indicator it does not differentiate between subjects with one or more adenoma detected.Keywords
This publication has 114 references indexed in Scilit:
- Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in EnglandEndoscopy, 2012
- The Efficacy of Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection and Cecal Intubation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012
- Randomized Trial of Gatorade/Polyethylene Glycol With or Without Bisacodyl and NuLYTELY for Colonoscopy PreparationClinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 2012
- Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer DeathsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Safety of cold polypectomy for < 10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter studyEndoscopy, 2011
- Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss ratesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented researchGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- Bleeding and Perforation After Outpatient Colonoscopy and Their Risk Factors in Usual Clinical PracticeGastroenterology, 2008
- Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995