A qualitative study of Equal Co-First Authorship
- 4 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Accountability in Research
- Vol. 27 (8), 496-520
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1776122
Abstract
Over the past several years, there has been a significant increase in the number of scientific articles with two or more authors claiming “Equal Co-First Authorship” (ECFA). This study provides a critical background to ECFA designations, discusses likely causes of its increased use, and explores arguments for and against the practice. Subsequently, it presents the results of a qualitative study that sought the opinion of 19 authors listed among equal first authors of recent publications in leading scientific journals about ECFA designations. Results show that circumstances leading to ECFA designations vary significantly from each other. While the development of policies for these situations would not be easy, participants suggested that the lack of clear and consistent policies regarding the attribution and evaluation of ECFA contributes to tensions amongst ECFA authors and obscures their preferred attributions of credit.Keywords
Funding Information
- Withheld for blind review
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Authorship DiplomacyAmerican Scientist, 2011
- “Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of AuthorshipAnnals of Epidemiology, 2010
- Metrics: A profusion of measuresNature, 2010
- Metrics: Do metrics matter?Nature, 2010
- Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessmentBMC Medical Education, 2010
- Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authorsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009
- The qualitative content analysis processJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008
- The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of KnowledgeScience, 2007
- A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation DataAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2006
- Multiple AuthorshipScience, 1981