Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Neuropsychologia
- Vol. 43 (14), 2125-2136
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.017
Abstract
Developmental prosopagnosia is a lifelong impairment in face recognition despite normal low-level visual processing. Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to examine the M170 response, a component occurring approximately 170 ms after stimulus onset, in a group of five developmental prosopagnosics. In normal subjects, the M170 is “face-selective”, with a consistently higher amplitude to faces than to a wide variety of other visual stimulus categories; the N170, a component recorded using event-related potentials (ERP) and thought to be analogous to the M170, also shows this “face selectivity”. Two previous ERP studies with developmental prosopagnosics have found attenuation or absence of face selectivity in the N170 response of these subjects [Bentin, S., Deouell, L. Y., & Soroker, N. (1999). Selective visual streaming in face recognition: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport, 10, 823–827; Kress, T., & Daum, I. (2003). Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 133–136]. Three of our developmental prosopagnosic group showed this non-selective pattern at the M170 while the remaining two prosopagnosics were indistinguishable from normal controls. Thus, impaired face recognition is not necessarily correlated with an absence of the “face-selective” M170. Furthermore, ERP recordings collected simultaneously in the two developmental prosopagnosics with seemingly selective M170s also showed N170s within the same normal selective range, demonstrating that the face-selective signals found with MEG are not due to differences between MEG and ERP. While the presence of face selectivity at these neurophysiological markers is insufficient for predicting normal behavioral performance with faces, it could help to distinguish different classes of face recognition deficits.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosiaCognitive Neuropsychology, 2004
- Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patientsBrain and Cognition, 2003
- Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of facesCognition, 2002
- Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS regionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000
- Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processingNeuroReport, 2000
- Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. I: Potentials Generated in Occipitotemporal Cortex by Face and Non-face StimuliCerebral Cortex, 1999
- A Familial Factor in the Development of Face Recognition DeficitsJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1999
- Selective visual streaming in face recognitionNeuroReport, 1999
- Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in HumansJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1996
- A Fifteen Year Follow-Up of a Case of Developmental ProsopagnosiaCortex, 1991