Do we need a concept of disease?
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
- Vol. 14 (1), 1-14
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993984
Abstract
The terms “health”, “disease” and “illness” are frequently used in clinical medicine. This has misled philosophers into believing that these concepts are important for clinical thinking and decision making. For instance, it is held that decisions about whether or not to treat someone or whether to relieve someone of moral responsibility depend on whether the person has a disease. In this paper it is argued that the crucial role of the ‘disease’ concept is illusory. The health/disease distinction is irrelevant for most decisions and represents a conceptual straightjacket. Sophisticated and mature clinical decision making requires that we free ourselves from the concept of disease.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the philosophy of medicine exist?Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1992
- On the Nature of HealthPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1987
- Values, Health, and MedicinePhilosophy of Science, 1980
- Comment on "Health as a Theoretical Concept"Philosophy of Science, 1980
- Health as a Theoretical ConceptPhilosophy of Science, 1977
- The Concept of DiseaseJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1976
- What a Theory of Mental Health should beJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1976
- The Concepts of Health and DiseasePhilosophy and Medicine, 1975
- Organs, Organisms and Disease: Human Ontology and Medical PracticePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1975
- What is disease?Philosophy of Science, 1954