How natural is a natural interface? An evaluation procedure based on action breakdowns
- 20 October 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
- Vol. 17 (1), 69-79
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0476-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gestural interfacesInteractions, 2010
- Natural user interfaces are not naturalInteractions, 2010
- Foot-based mobile interaction with gamesPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2004
- Delaying execution of intentions: overcoming the costs of interruptionsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2004
- Appropriateness of foot interaction for non-accurate spatial tasksPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2004
- A Survey of Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of MethodsPRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2002
- Design guidelines for dealing with breakdowns and repairs in collaborative work settingsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2000
- The omni-directional treadmillPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1997
- A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable work area for head-mounted display systemsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1992
- On understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design: A response to the reviewsArtificial Intelligence, 1987