IS MORE STRUCTURE REALLY BETTER? A COMPARISON OF FRAME‐OF‐REFERENCE TRAINING AND DESCRIPTIVELY ANCHORED RATING SCALES TO IMPROVE INTERVIEWERS’ RATING QUALITY
- 17 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 64 (1), 53-87
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01202.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- DEVELOPING A NOMOLOGICAL NETWORK FOR INTERVIEW STRUCTURE: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE STRUCTURED SELECTION INTERVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 2005
- Levels of processing: Past, present... and future?Memory, 2002
- Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s GuideOrganizational Research Methods, 2002
- A brief history of the selection interview: may the next 100 years be more fruitfulJournal of Management History, 2000
- On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater AgreementOrganizational Research Methods, 1999
- A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 1997
- A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995
- A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Effect of rater training on rater accuracy: Levels-of-processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980