Corporate Form and the State: Business Policy and Change from the Multidivisional to the Multilayered Subsidiary Form*
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wiley in Sociological Inquiry
- Vol. 67 (2), 151-174
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1997.tb00437.x
Abstract
The largest industrial corporations are changing to a multilayered subsidiary form. Whereas corporations have used subsidiaries to organize their assets since the turn of the century, the number of wholly owned subsidiaries in the 100 largest industrial corporations doubled between 1981 and 1993. The question addressed here is: Why are corporations changing their form now? I suggest that the question is historically contingent and that the answer is, in parr, explained by changes in state business policy. A capital dependence framework is elaborated to examine the relationship between state business policy and corporations in the 1970s and 1980s. Business policy changes-resulting in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the Revenue Act of 1987-provided corporations with tax-free procedures for parent companies to simultaneously restructure their divisions as subsidiaries and restructure their debt. There are additional incentives for corporations to restructure their divisions as subsidiaries: (1) creating a liability firewall between the parent company and its subsidiary corporations, limiting the financial risk of parent companies, and (2) creating an internal capital market, providing an alternative form of financing thereby reducing corporations' dependence on external capital markets.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eclipse of the Public CorporationSSRN Electronic Journal, 1999
- The Political Economy of Business Failures Across the American States, 1970-1985: The Impact of Reagan's New FederalismAmerican Sociological Review, 1995
- The Political Economy of Manufacturing Growth and Decline across the American States, 1970-1985Social Forces, 1994
- The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational FormAmerican Sociological Review, 1994
- Irrationality and Contradiction in Organizational Change: Transformation in the Corporate Form of a U.S. Steel Corporation, 1930–1987The Sociological Quarterly, 1991
- Steel and the State: Industry Politics and Business Policy Formation, 1940-1989American Sociological Review, 1990
- Technology, Control, and the Social Organization of Work at a British Hardware Firm, 1791-1891American Journal of Sociology, 1987
- The Unfolding of the Interlocking Directorate Structure of the United StatesAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Organizational Contradictions in Public Bureaucracies: Toward a Marxian Theory of OrganizationsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1977