Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building
- 14 May 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Vol. 85 (3), 372-386
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12078
Abstract
There is growing interest in using argumentative discourse in educational settings. However, in a previous study, we found that discourse goals (persuasion vs. consensus) while arguing can affect student outcomes in both content learning and reasoning. In this study, we look at argumentative discourse data from a previous study to ask how differences in discourse might account for the differences we observed in learning and reasoning outcomes. One hundred and five dialogues (57 disputative, 48 consensus) between 7th grade science students attending a public high school near Tarragona, Spain. Participants were randomly assigned to conditions and paired with peers who disagreed with them on three topics related to renewable energy sources. After instruction on each topic, they were asked to either 'argue to convince' (persuasion condition) or 'argue to reach consensus' (consensus condition) on that topic. Conversations were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Students in the persuasion condition engaged in shorter conversational exchanges around argumentative claims and were more likely to use moves that foreclosed discussion, whereas students in the consensus condition were more likely to use moves that elicited, elaborated on, and integrated their partners' ideas. When arguing to reach - rather than defend - a conclusion, students are more likely to coconstruct knowledge by exchanging and integrating arguments. These findings are consistent with predictions about the potential of argumentation for knowledge building and suggest that teachers must attend to discourse goals when using argumentation to support learning and reasoning.Funding Information
- Ministerio de Ciencia y Innovación, Spain (EDU2013-47593-C2-2-P)
- Ministerio de Educacion, Spain (SAB2010-0124)
- Universitat de Barcelona (APIF2013)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive DiscourseDiscourse Processes, 2010
- Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical DiscourseScience, 2010
- The locus of the myside bias in written argumentationThinking & Reasoning, 2008
- Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructionsJournal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2007
- The Effects of Goal Instructions and Text on the Generation of Counterarguments During Writing.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005
- The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
- Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledgeEducational Psychologist, 1998
- Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in MathematicsJournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1996
- Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the ClassroomEducational Researcher, 1994
- HPV-Inzidenz und -Typenverteilung bei verschiedenen gynäkologischen PatientenkollektivenGynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau, 1991