Remaking laissez-faire
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by SAGE Publications in Progress in Human Geography
- Vol. 32 (1), 3-43
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507084816
Abstract
`Only ideas can overcome ideas', Ludwig von Mises once remarked. Exploring this contention in relation to the long and winding ascendancy of neoliberalism, the paper presents a spatialized genealogy of the free-market ideational programme. From its multiple beginnings, in a series of situated, sympathetic critiques of nineteenth-century laissez-faire, neoliberalism has always been an open-ended, plural and adaptable project. The prehistories of neoliberalism are messy and nonlinear; there was no straight-line evolution from ideas to implementation, from blueprint to ballot box, or philosophy to practice. Rather like the various state projects of neoliberalization that have followed in its wake, the ideational project of neoliberalism was clearly a constructed one. There was nothing spontaneous about neoliberalism; it was speculatively planned, it was opportunistically built and it has been repeatedly reconstructed.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polanyi's “Double Movement”: The Belle Époques of British and U.S. Hegemony ComparedPolitics & Society, 2003
- 'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentalityEconomy and Society, 2001
- Inflation and employment: is there a third way?Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2000
- The Emigration of the Austrian EconomistsHistory of Political Economy, 1986
- Red Vienna: Socialism in One City, 1918-27European Studies Review, 1983
- On the "Chicago School of Economics"Journal of Political Economy, 1962
- Observations on the "Chicago School(s)"Journal of Political Economy, 1962
- On the "Chicago School of Economics": CommentJournal of Political Economy, 1962
- German NeoliberalismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1960
- The Political Thought of Neo-LiberalismAmerican Political Science Review, 1955