Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior
- 31 July 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 115 (2), 181-190
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- The Functional Theory of Counterfactual ThinkingPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2008
- Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance HypothesisPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2007
- How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and DisappointmentOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Anchoring in Simulated Competitive Market NegotiationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence JudgmentsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Outcome Knowledge, Regret, and Omission BiasOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995
- Elastic Justification: How Tempting but Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence DecisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995
- Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992