Diagnosis and Management of Inadvertently Placed Pacing and ICD Leads in the Left Ventricle: A Multicenter Experience and Review of the Literature
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 23 (5), 877-883
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00858.x
Abstract
Three patients from different centers with pacemaker or ICD leads endocardially implanted in the left ventricle are described. All leads, two ventricular pacing leads and one ICD lead, were inserted through a patent foramen ovale or an atrial septum defect. The diagnosis was made 9 months. 14 months, and 16 years, respectively, after implantation. All patients had right bundle branch block configuration during ventricular pacing. Chest X ray was suggestive of a left‐sided positioned lead except in the ICD patient. Diagnosis was confirmed with echocardiography in all patients. One patient with a ventricular pacing lead presented with a transient ischcmic attack at 1‐month postimplantation. During surgical repair of the atrial septum defect 14 months later, the lead was extracted and thrombus was attached to the lead despite therapy with aspirin. The other patients were asymptomatic without anticoagulation (9 months and 16 years after implant). No thrombus was present on the ICD lead at the time of the cardiac transplantation in one patient. We reviewed 27 patients with permanent leads described in the literature. Ten patients experienced thromboembolic complications, including three of ten patients on antiplatelet therapy. The lead was removed in six patients, anticoagulation with warfarin was effective for secondary prevention in the four remaining patients. In the asymptomatic patients, the lead was removed in five patients. In the remaining patients, 1 patient was on warfarin, 2 were on antiplatelet therapy, and in 3 patients the medication was unknown. After malposition was diagnosed, three additional patients were treated with warfarin. In conclusion, if timely removal of a malpositioned lead in the left ventricle is not preformed, lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin can be recommended as the first choice therapy and lead extraction reserved in case of failure or during concomitant surgery.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inadvertent Malposition of a Transvenous-lnserted Pacing Lead in the Left Ventricular ChamberThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Echocardiographic detection of perforation of the cardiac ventricular septum by a permanent pacemaker leadThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Computed Tomographic Localization of Malposition of Pacing Electrodes: The Value of Cardiovascular Computed TomographyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- Amaurosis Fugax in a Patient with a Left Ventricular Endocardial PacemakerPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- An Unusual Electrocardiographic Pattern of Left Ventricular Endocardial PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1980
- Echocardiographic evaluation of intracardiac pacing catheters: M-mode and two-dimensional studies.Circulation, 1978
- Unusual Electrocardiographic Pattern During Transvenous Pacing From the Middle Cardiac VeinPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1978
- Malplacement of Endocardial Pacemaker Electrodes in the middle cardiac veinActa Medica Scandinavica, 1976
- Perforation of the interventricular septum by transvenous pacemaker catheter: Diagnosis by change in pattern of depolarization on the electrocardiogram∗The American Journal of Cardiology, 1969
- Unusual patterns of conduction produced by pacemaker stimuliAmerican Heart Journal, 1967