“People over Profits”: Retailers Who Voluntarily Ended Tobacco Sales
Open Access
- 22 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (1), e85751
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085751
Abstract
Tobacco retailers are key players in the ongoing tobacco epidemic. Tobacco outlet density is linked to a greater likelihood of youth and adult smoking and greater difficulty quitting. While public policy efforts to address the tobacco problem at the retail level have been limited, some retailers have voluntarily ended tobacco sales. A previous pilot study examined this phenomenon in California, a state with a strong tobacco program focused on denormalizing smoking and the tobacco industry. We sought to learn what motivated retailers in other states to end tobacco sales and how the public and media responded. We conducted interviews with owners, managers, or representatives of six grocery stores in New York and Ohio that had voluntarily ended tobacco sales since 2007. We also conducted unobtrusive observations at stores and analyzed media coverage of each retailer’s decision. Grocery store owners ended tobacco sales for two reasons, alone or in combination: health or ethics-related, including a desire to send a consistent health message to employees and customers, and business-related, including declining tobacco sales or poor fit with the store’s image. The decision to end sales often appeared to resolve troubling contradictions between retailers’ values and selling deadly products. New York retailers attributed declining sales to high state tobacco taxes. All reported largely positive customer reactions and most received media coverage. Forty-one percent of news items were letters to the editor or editorials; most (69%) supported the decision. Voluntary decisions by retailers to abandon tobacco sales may lay the groundwork for mandatory policies and further denormalize tobacco. Our study also suggests that high tobacco taxes may have both direct and indirect effects on tobacco use. Highlighting the contradictions between being a responsible business and selling deadly products may support voluntary decisions by retailers to end tobacco sales.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumer perceptions of the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies and grocery stores among U.S. adultsBMC Research Notes, 2013
- The tobacco-free generation proposalTobacco Control, 2013
- Tobacco endgames: what they are and are not, issues for tobacco control strategic planning and a possible US scenarioTobacco Control, 2013
- Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolitionTobacco Control, 2013
- Local Tobacco Policy and Tobacco Outlet Density: Associations With Youth SmokingJournal of Adolescent Health, 2012
- Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysisTobacco Control, 2012
- Why California retailers stop selling tobacco products, and what their customers and employees think about it when they do: case studiesBMC Public Health, 2011
- The Effect of Tobacco Outlet Density and Proximity on Smoking CessationAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2011
- Phasing-out tobacco: proposal to deny access to tobacco for those born from 2000Tobacco Control, 2010
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005