Progress in magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumours
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Current Opinion in Oncology
- Vol. 19 (6), 616-622
- https://doi.org/10.1097/cco.0b013e3282f076b2
Abstract
Advances in magnetic resonance based techniques have yielded improvements in both high-resolution anatomical imaging and methods to evaluate physiology and function. This review focuses on recent developments in these techniques as applied to pretreatment staging and post-treatment evaluation of brain tumours.Journal ArticleReviewSCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publisheKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Malignant Supratentorial Astrocytoma Treated with Postoperative Radiation Therapy: Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Quantitative Diffusion-weighted MR ImagingRadiology, 2007
- The clinical value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in adult brain tumoursClinical Radiology, 2007
- Peritumoral edema of meningiomas and metastatic brain tumors: differences in diffusion characteristics evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imagingNeuroradiology, 2007
- Diffusion Imaging: Insight to Cell Status and CytoarchitectureNeuroimaging Clinics of North America, 2006
- Feasibility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3T using a standard quadrature head coil and eight-channel phased-array coil with and without SENSE reconstructionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Presurgical planning for tumor resectioningJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Tumors at Ultrahigh FieldTopics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Preoperative Grading of Gliomas by Using Metabolite Quantification with High-Spatial-Resolution Proton MR Spectroscopic ImagingRadiology, 2006
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Possible Implications for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of Patients with High-grade GliomaClinical Oncology, 2005
- Brain Tumors: Full- and Half-Dose Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging at 3.0 T Compared with 1.5 T—Initial ExperienceRadiology, 2005