A Delphi Method Expert Survey to Derive Standards for Flood Damage Data Collection
- 28 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 30 (1), 107-124
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01325.x
Abstract
For the purpose of flood damage analyses reliable, comparable, comprehensive, consistent, and up-to-date data are an indispensable need. Like in many other countries a database with this kind of datasets does not exist in Germany. To establish it, standards have to be set for flood damage data collection. We approached this problem by questioning experts about their information needs for flood damage analysis. This survey is done by applying a Delphi survey approach. The aptitude of the Delphi approach to assess, structure, and standardize expert knowledge is evaluated in this article. In the survey a panel of 55 experts working in the field of flood damage analysis for insurances, engineering companies/consultancy, public water management, and universities and other scientific institutions helped to identify common information needs. The multi-step Delphi method proved to reduce the deviation of answers thereby enabling consensual results and also enhanced the quality by modifying group answers in the direction of experience based answers. There was also a high level of congruence in information needs between experts from different fields of employment that allowed the derivation of common standards.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert elicitation of recharge model probabilities for the Death Valley regional flow systemJournal of Hydrology, 2008
- How Accurate are Disaster Loss Data? The Case of U.S. Flood DamageNatural Hazards, 2005
- Global Perspectives on Loss of Human Life Caused by FloodsNatural Hazards, 2005
- The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applicationsInformation & Management, 2004
- Optimal elicitation of probabilistic information from expertsGeological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004
- An introduction to prior information derived from probabilistic judgements: elicitation of knowledge, cognitive bias and herdingGeological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004
- A New Way to Ask the Experts—Rating Radioactive Waste RisksScience, 1996
- Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Typologies Are MisleadingThe American Statistician, 1993
- Ex post analysis of flood control: Benefit‐cost analysis and the value of informationWater Resources Research, 1988
- On the Theory of Scales of MeasurementScience, 1946