Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review
- 10 August 2006
- Vol. 333 (7563), 346-349
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346
Abstract
Most evaluations of new treatments use highly selected populations, making it difficult to decide whether they would work elsewhere. Systematic evaluation and reporting of applicability is requiredThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Evidence-Based Medicine Relevant to the Developing World?PLoS Medicine, 2005
- A Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial of a Sexual Health Approach to Long-Term HIV Risk Reduction for Men Who Have Sex with Men: Effects of the Intervention on Unsafe Sexual BehaviorAIDS Education and Prevention, 2002
- Changing Sexual Behavior Among Gay Male Repeat Testers for HIVJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002
- Does bar-based, peer-led sexual health promotion have a community-level effect amongst gay men in Scotland?International Journal of STD & AIDS, 2002
- A cognitive behavioural intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections among gay men: randomised trialBMJ, 2001
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Peer education has no significant impact on HIV risk behaviours among gay men in LondonAIDS, 2001
- Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve healthBMJ, 2000
- A technology transfer model for effective HIV/AIDS interventions: science and practice.2000
- Examining self-justifications for unsafe sex as a technique of AIDS education: the importance of personal relevanceInternational Journal of STD & AIDS, 1998