Retention of mercury by low-cost sorbents: Influence of flue gas composition and fly ash occurrence
- 29 September 2012
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Chemical Engineering Journal
- Vol. 213, 16-21
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.054
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustionJournal of Environmental Management, 2012
- Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plantsEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2011
- Differential partitioning and speciation of Hg in wet FGD facilities of two Spanish PCC power plantsChemosphere, 2011
- Development of Gold Nanoparticle-Doped Activated Carbon Sorbent for Elemental MercuryEnergy & Fuels, 2011
- Feasibility of mercury removal from simulated flue gas by activated chars made from poultry manuresJournal of Environmental Management, 2010
- Mercury control technologies for coal combustion and gasification systemsFuel, 2009
- Noble Metal Catalysts for Mercury Oxidation in Utility Flue GasPlatinum Metals Review, 2008
- The thief process for mercury removal from flue gasJournal of Environmental Management, 2006
- Using Wet-FGD systems for mercury removalPublished by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) ,2005
- Interactions between vapor-phase mercury compounds and coal char in synthetic flue gasFuel Processing Technology, 2000