Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP Study
Open Access
- 31 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 56 (4), 294-300
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.4.294
Abstract
Objectives: Associations between two alternative formulations of job stress derived from the effort-reward imbalance and the job strain model and first non-fatal acute myocardial infarction were studied. Whereas the job strain model concentrates on situational (extrinsic) characteristics the effort-reward imbalance model analyses distinct person (intrinsic) characteristics in addition to situational ones. In view of these conceptual differences the hypothesis was tested that combining information from the two models improves the risk estimation of acute myocardial infarction. Methods: 951 male and female myocardial infarction cases and 1147 referents aged 45-64 years of The Stockholm Heart Epidemiology (SHEEP) case-control study underwent a clinical examination. Information on job stress and health adverse behaviours was derived from standardised questionnaires. Results: Multivariate analysis showed moderately increased odds ratios for either model, Yet, with respect to the effort-reward imbalance model gender specific effects were found: in men the extrinsic component contributed to risk estimation, whereas this was the case with the intrinsic component in women. Controlling each job stress model for the other in order to test the independent effect of either approach did not show systematically increased odds ratios. An improved estimation of acute myocardial infarction risk resulted from combining information from the two models by defining groups characterised by simultaneous exposure to effort-reward imbalance and job strain (men: odds ratio 2.02 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.34 to 3.07); women odds ratio 2.19 (95% Cl 1.11 to 4.28)). Conclusions: Findings show an improved risk estimation of acute myocardial infarction by combining information from the two job stress models under study. Moreover, gender specific effects of the two components of the effort-reward imbalance model were observed.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Higher relative, but lower absolute risks of myocardial infarction in women than in men: analysis of some major risk factors in the S heep studyJournal of Internal Medicine, 1999
- High effort, low reward, and cardiovascular risk factors in employed Swedish men and women: baseline results from the WOLF StudyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1998
- The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1998
- Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidenceThe Lancet, 1997
- Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- The influence of the work environment on cardiovascular health: A historical, conceptual, and methodological perspective.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- Low status control, high effort at work and ischemic heart disease: Prospective evidence from blue-collar menSocial Science & Medicine, 1990