Nonfunctioning Options: A Closer Look
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 58 (4), 605-611
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058004004
Abstract
In a previous study, Cizek and O'Day reported the effects of eliminating nonfunctioning options from five-option, multiple-choice test items. That study, however, only investigated the effect of option removal on item performance when items were studied as a set and not the effects of option removal for individual items. The authors also did not examine potential changes in dimensionality resulting from altering the items. The present study provides a closer look at the effect of removing nonfunctioning options by examining changes in difficulty, discrimination, and dimensionality. Results of these analyses supported the conclusions of the earlier research and provide additional support for benefits that may accrue from eliminating nonfunctioning options: enhanced score reliability, reduced testing time, potential for broader domain sampling, and consequent increased validity of score interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Further Investigation of Nonfunctioning Options in Multiple-Choice Test ItemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
- How Many Options is Enough for a Multiple-Choice Test Item?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993
- Traditional Dimensionality Versus Essential DimensionalityJournal of Educational Measurement, 1991
- Validity of a Taxonomy of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing RulesApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- OPTIMAL NUMBER OF CHOICES PER ITEM— A COMPARISON OF FOUR APPROACHES*Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- The optimal number of alternatives at a choice point with travel time consideredJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1976
- THE NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES FOR OPTIMUM TEST RELIABILITYJournal of Educational Measurement, 1975
- Three-Choice Versus Four-Choice Items: Implications for Reliability and Validity Of Objective Achievement TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
- The Optimal Number of Alternatives in Multiple-Choice Achievement Tests: Some Empirical Evidence for a Mathematical ProofEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Expected Reliability as a Function of Choices Per ItemEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1969