Opening the Black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation
Open Access
- 4 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 38 (3), 838-845
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn372
Abstract
Recent criticism of epidemiologic methods has focused on the limitations of ‘black box’ epidemiology, a pejorative label given to the simple identification of exposure–disease relationships. The assessment of mediation is an important tool for addressing this criticism. By using mediation analysis to open the black box, underlying mechanisms of the observed associations can be described and causal inference improved. An explicit theoretical motivation for such an analysis has been missing from the epidemiological literature. To provide this motivation, we integrate literature from epidemiology and other social sciences to describe the reasons that an investigator might want to assess mediation. We then describe the connections between these reasons and specific measures of indirect and direct effects that have been previously described.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mediation AnalysisAnnual Review of Psychology, 2007
- Psychiatric EpidemiologyPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2006
- Fallibility in estimating direct effects.International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods, 2002
- Beyond black box epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Emerging objectives and methods in epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Epidemiology Faces Its LimitsScience, 1995
- Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology, 1992
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986