Defining Patient Complexity From the Primary Care Physician's Perspective
- 20 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 155 (12), 797-804
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00001
Abstract
Patients with complex health needs are increasingly the focus of health system redesign. To characterize complex patients, as defined by their primary care physicians (PCPs), and to compare this definition with other commonly used algorithms. Cohort study. 1 hospital-based practice, 4 community health centers, and 7 private practices in a primary care network in the United States. 40 physicians who reviewed a random sample of 120 of their own patients. After excluding patients for whom they were not directly responsible, PCPs indicated which of their patients they considered complex. These patients were characterized, independent predictors of complexity were identified, and PCP-defined complexity was compared with 3 comorbidity-based methods (Charlson score, Higashi score, and a proprietary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services algorithm). Physicians identified 1126 of their 4302 eligible patients (26.2%) as complex and assigned a mean of 2.2 domains of complexity per patient (median, 2.0 [interquartile range, 1 to 3]). Mental health and substance use were identified as major issues in younger complex patients, whereas medical decision making and care coordination predominated in older patients (P < 0.001 for trends by decade). Major independent predictors of PCP-defined complexity (P < 0.001) included age (probability of complexity increased from 14.8% to 19.8% with age increasing from 55 to 65 years), poorly controlled diabetes (from 12.7% to 47.6% if hemoglobin A1c level ≥9%), use of antipsychotics (from 12.7% to 31.8%), alcohol-related diagnoses (from 12.9% to 27.4%), and inadequate insurance (from 12.5% to 19.2%). Classification agreement for complex patients ranged from 26.2% to 56.0% when PCP assignment was compared with each of the other methods. Results may not be generalizable to other primary care settings. Primary care physicians identified approximately one quarter of their patients as complex. Medical, social, and behavioral factors all contributed to PCP-defined complexity. Physician-defined complexity had only modest agreement with 3 comorbidity-based algorithms. Partners Community Healthcare, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transforming Primary Care: From Past Practice To The Practice Of The FutureHealth Affairs, 2010
- Defining Comorbidity: Implications for Understanding Health and Health ServicesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2009
- Primary care for patient complexity, not only disease.Families, Systems, & Health, 2009
- Relationship between Number of Medical Conditions and Quality of CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Measuring Quality of Care in Patients With Multiple Clinical Conditions: Summary of a Conference Conducted by the Society of General Internal MedicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Applying a Risk-Adjustment Framework to Primary Care: Can We Improve on Existing Measures?Annals of Family Medicine, 2003
- Prevalence, Expenditures, and Complications of Multiple Chronic Conditions in the ElderlyArchives of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Changing The Chronic Care System To Meet People’s NeedsHealth Affairs, 2001
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987