Exploring interaction effects in small samples increases rates of false-positive and false-negative findings: results from a systematic review and simulation study
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 67 (7), 821-829
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of three tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in multicenter trials with unequal sample sizes within and among centersBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Estimating measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposuresEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- A Tutorial on Methods to Estimating Clinically and Policy-Meaningful Measures of Treatment Effects in Prospective Observational Studies: A ReviewThe International Journal of Biostatistics, 2011
- A new heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator for the linear regression modelAStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2010
- Test Homogeneity of Risk Difference Across Subgroups in Clinical TrialsJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2009
- Assessing Interaction in Case-Control StudiesEpidemiology, 2004
- Small sample performance of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in K 2 × 2 tablesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Statistical analysis of K 2 x 2 tables: a comparative study of estimators/test statistics for association and homogeneity.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1990
- Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: A review and a study of powerStatistics in Medicine, 1983