Evaluating Boards of Directors: what constitutes a good corporate board?
- 15 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Vol. 12 (4), 461-478
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00387.x
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to identify what constitutes a good board of directors, and this is based on a comparison between academic literature, corporate governance rating systems and our field research into board practices. We observed that “traditional” academic research focused on a limited number of quantifiable board characteristics, while practitioners attach greater importance to “soft” elements, which are nearly absent in the literature and in the governance ratings. These findings highlight the need for a better understanding of all elements that determine board effectiveness. Furthermore, our results identify three areas of improvement for boards of directors.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRAPPLING WITH Dysfunctional BOARD RELATIONSHIPSJournal of Business Strategy, 2002
- An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performanceJournal of Management, 2001
- Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic LiteratureSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countriesThe European Journal of Finance, 1998
- Board Composition and Organizational Performance: Two Studies of Insider/outsider EffectsJournal of Management Studies, 1998
- A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boardsCorporate Governance: An International Review, 1998
- Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approachCorporate Governance: An International Review, 1998
- Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm: An empirical assessmentStrategic Management Journal, 1994
- The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate StrategyAcademy of Management Review, 1990
- Agency Problems and Residual ClaimsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983