An Agenda for Open Science in Communication
Open Access
- 11 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Communication
- Vol. 71 (1), 1-26
- https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052
Abstract
In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at CortexCortex, 2012
- Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine SciencePerspectives on Psychological Science, 2012
- Let's PublishFewerPapersPsychological Inquiry, 2012
- Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingPsychological Science, 2012
- False-Positive PsychologyPsychological Science, 2011
- Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on FacebookJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008
- A Critical Assessment of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing in Quantitative Communication ResearchHuman Communication Research, 2008
- HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are KnownPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 1998
- Finding the missing science: The fate of studies submitted for review by a human subjects committee.Psychological Methods, 1997
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979