Meta-analysis of the relation between European and American smokeless tobacco and oral cancer
Open Access
- 14 November 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 7 (1), 334
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-334
Abstract
Background: Smokeless tobacco is often referred to as a major contributor to oral cancer. In some regions, especially Southeast Asia, the risk is difficult to quantify due to the variety of products, compositions (including non-tobacco ingredients) and usage practices involved. In Western populations, the evidence of an increased risk in smokeless tobacco users seems unclear, previous reviews having reached somewhat differing conclusions. We report a detailed quantitative review of the evidence in American and European smokeless tobacco users, and compare our findings with previous reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: Following literature review a meta-analysis was conducted of 32 epidemiological studies published between 1920 and 2005 including tests for homogeneity and publication bias. Results: Based on 38 heterogeneous study-specific estimates of the odds ratio or relative risk for smokeless tobacco use, the random-effects estimate was 1.87 (95% confidence interval 1.40-2.48). The increase was mainly evident in studies conducted before 1980. No increase was seen in studies in Scandinavia. Restricting attention to the seven estimates adjusted for smoking and alcohol eliminated both heterogeneity and excess risk (1.02; 0.82-1.28). Estimates also varied by sex (higher in females) and by study design (higher in case-control studies with hospital controls) but more clearly in studies where estimates were unadjusted, even for age. The pattern of estimates suggests some publication bias. Based on limited data specific to never smokers, the random-effects estimate was 1.94 (0.88-4.28), the eight individual estimates being heterogeneous and based on few exposed cases. Conclusion: Smokeless tobacco, as used in America or Europe, carries at most a minor increased risk of oral cancer. However, elevated risks in specific populations or from specific products cannot definitely be excluded.This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facilitating meta‐analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease categoryStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Two large prospective studies of mortality among men who use snuff or chewing tobacco (United States)Cancer Causes & Control, 2005
- Smokeless tobacco use and risk of cancer of the pancreas and other organsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: an analysis of prognostic factorsBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2000
- Oral cancer in a tobacco-chewing US population—no apparent increased incidence or mortalityOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 1998
- Oral verrucous carcinomaOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 1998
- Smokeless tobaccoBritish Medical Bulletin, 1996
- Role of diet in upper aerodigestive tract cancersNutrition and Cancer, 1987
- Snuff Dipping and Oral Cancer among Women in the Southern United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981